Political Accountability and Fiscal Governance: Evidence from Tanzania and Zambia
نویسندگان
چکیده
Does a government’s source of revenue explain its policy choices? The most common approach contends that policy variation results from differences in political institutions. We argue that a government’s source of revenue also strongly affects its expenditures, independent of political institutions. Using local government budget data from Tanzania and Zambia, we find that local governments devote a larger share of their budget to public services as local taxes increase. Alternatively, as local governments receive more resources from central government transfers and foreign assistance, the share of the local budget allocated to employee benefits and administrative costs rises. Since there is no variation in the powers of local governments in Tanzania and Zambia, these results are independent of differences in political institutions. Among other things, the results suggest that the effectiveness of central government and especially donor attempts to increase local government accountability will be in part a consequence of how these efforts affect the fiscal link between a local government and its citizens. 1 Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Fiscal Governance and Public Services: Evidence from Tanzania and Zambia
Does a government’s source of revenue explain its policies? The predominate view in development studies contends that policy variation results directly from institutional variation. Building on a literature which we label fiscal theories of governance, we argue that a government’s sources of revenue strongly affect its public expenditures, independent of institutions. Using data from local gove...
متن کاملThe Need for Global Application of the Accountability for Reasonableness Approach to Support Sustainable Outcomes; Comment on “Expanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy”
The accountability for reasonableness (AFR) concept has been developed and discussed for over two decades. Its interpretation has been studied in several ways partly guided by the specific settings and the researchers involved. This has again influenced the development of the concept, but not led to universal application. The potential use in health technology assessments (HTAs) has recently be...
متن کاملWhat Can We Learn About the Processes of Regulation of Tuberculosis Medicines From the Experiences of Health Policy and System Actors in India, Tanzania, and Zambia?
Background The unregulated availability and irrational use of tuberculosis (TB) medicines is a major issue of public health concern globally. Governments of many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have committed to regulating the quality and availability of TB medicines, but with variable success. Regulation of TB medicines remains an intractable challenge in many settings, but the reason...
متن کاملDecentralization and Governance
The most important theoretical argument concerning decentralization is that it can improve governance by making government more accountable and responsive to the governed. Improving governance is also central to the motivations of real-world reformers, who bear risks and costs in the interest of devolution. But the literature has mostly focused instead on policy-relevant outcomes, such as educa...
متن کاملA Pattern for Assessing the Health System Governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran: A Thematic Analysis
Abstract Background: Governance in the health system is not just a vision, or a model for delivering services, but a key element in planning, implementing and evaluating activities to improve health. The main purpose of this study was to design a pattern for assessing Iran's Health System Governance. Methods: The present study was descriptive in terms of purpose, qualitative in terms of appli...
متن کامل